Legal Opinion

Bell v. Misenheimer

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 4, 2008No. CA 07-1132Published

1Opinion of the Court

285 S.W.3d 693 (2008)

Sharon BELL, Appellant,

v.

James MISENHEIMER, Appellee.

No. CA 07-1132.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas.

June 4, 2008.

Gary Eubanks & Associates, by: William Gary Holt, Little Rock, for appellant.

Clark S. Brewster and Drew Rogers, Bryant, for appellee.

KAREN R. BAKER, Judge.

Appellant Sharon Bell challenges a jury verdict in favor of appellee James Misenheimer brought by Ms. Bell for damages from a car accident. She asserts that there was no evidence to support the circuit court's instruction to the jury on comparative fault and that she is entitled to a new trial. Her argument has…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Keck v. American Employment Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Barnes v. EverettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Skinner v. R.J. Griffin & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Ouachita Wilderness Institute v. MergenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Ethyl Corp. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API