Legal Opinion

Warhorse-Baltimore Real Estate, LLC v. Fore

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 26, 2013No. Civil Action No. WMN-13-2336PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 12. Plaintiffs opposed the motion. Defendants have not replied to that opposition and the time for so doing has expired. Upon a review of the papers and the applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary, Local Rule 105.6, and that the motion will be denied.

Plaintiffs Warhorse-Baltimore Real Estate, LLC (Warhorse), Richard Burton, Dale Dowers, and Michael Borden filed a 27 page, 87 paragraph Complaint in this action on August 12, 2013. Thomas Fore, Patrick…

2Cases cited5 opinions

Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
National Union Fire Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. Rite Aid Of South Carolina, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
Ryan v. Volpone Stamp Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
Heinrich v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1982
R-Delight Holding LLC v. AndersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

Masaitis v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020