Legal Opinion

Teeple v. Stanley

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1949No. Civ. No. 7650Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff and appellant, surviving husband of Tymie P. Teeple, deceased, filed this action for reformation of a deed which conveyed certain real property to Tymie P. Teeple as her separate property, and by *582said action sought to reform the deed so that it would convey the property to himself and Tymie P. Teeple as joint tenants. Defendant and respondent Henry IT. Stanley is a son of said deceased, and he and appellant are her only heirs at law. Appellant alleged that the consideration for said deed was the joint tenancy funds of him and his wife, but that by the mutual…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bauer v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Ex parte CaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Guardianship of VucinichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Stevens v. Superior Court of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. In re Estate of HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API