Legal Opinion
Georgia Public Service Commission v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 28, 1997No. A97A0226PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Harold R. Banke.
The Georgia Public Service Commission (“the Commission”) appeals an order of the Fulton County Superior Court holding that the ICC Termination Act of 1995 preempted the Commission’s efforts to impose economic regulations on CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSX”). The Commission enumerates five errors.
This case arose after CSX sought the Commission’s permission to modify the staffing at CSX’s service facility at Cordele, Georgia, by reducing the employees from two to one and consolidating some of the services with those provided at the CSX customer service facility in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Teper v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Sunn v. Mercury MarineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Cohen v. ReismanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Moss v. Central State HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Henderson v. AlversonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Auburn v. United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- City of Auburn, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington v. The United States Government and the Surface Transportation Board, an Agency of the United States Government King County, a Washington Municipal Corporation Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation, City of Auburn, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington City of Yakima, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington City of Kent, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington v. U.S. Government the Surface Transportation Board, an Agency of the United States Government, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Acquisition, Inc. ("Bnsf Acquisition") and the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company ("Bn/santa Fe"), Respondents-Intervenors. City of Auburn, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington v. U.S. Government the Surface Transportation Board, an Agency of the United States Government, and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, Intervenors/respondentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Ridgefield Park v. NY & Western Ry.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Wet Walls, Inc. v. LedezmaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004