Legal Opinion
First Natl. Bank v. Guynes
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 1, 1929No. 3566PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.
The issues in this case appear at first blush to be somewhat involved, but, narrowed down, the question is whether A. D. Potts owns a certain check for $400, or whether that cheek is owned by the Cedar Creek Petroleum Company.
The First National Bank of Winnfield, plaintiff herein, is a judgment creditor of A. D. Potts, and in January, 1928, obtained a writ of fieri facias under its judgment, and by petition made the Bank of Winnfield, another bank in the same town, a party garnishee, and propounded to it interrogatories in order to ascertain if it was indebted to the said Potts, or if it had…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Branson v. WirthSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- E. C. Taylor Co. v. New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tyson v. SpearmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Reed v. Eureka Homestead Soc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Robinson v. MarksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- Viso v. GulloSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- C. C. Heberling Co. v. DaltonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.