Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Myrick

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 16, 2020No. 2:15-cv-01423Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DOMINIC BAILEY, Case No. 2:15-cv-01423-HZ Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. JOHN MYRICK, Respondent. Susan F. Wilk Assistant Federal Public Defender 101 S.W. Main Street, Suite 1700 Portland, Oregon 97204 Attorney for Petitioner Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General Samuel A. Kubernick, Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, Oregon 97310 Attorneys for Respondent HERNANDEZ, District Judge. Petitioner brings this habeas corpus case pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

challenging the legality of his Marion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API