Stuckey v. City of Tulsa

Defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, alleging rhe case-made attached to the petition in error to he void for two reasons. The first ground relied upon has been determined adversely to movant’s contention and will not be considered.

As the second ground for dismissal the city of Tulsa says that the ease-made was settled and signed in the absence of its counsel on a day subsequent to that designated in 'the only notice given of the time and place of settlement. The notice contained in the record on appeal advised defendant in error that on the sixth day of November, 1924,…