Legal Opinion
Lakeview Amusement Corporation v. Fabors
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 30, 1962No. 39971PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
This is an original proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Court in favor of claimant Ruth I. Fabors, and against respondent Lakeview Amusement Corporation and its insurance carrier, Standard Insurance Company.
Claimant worked as a cashier in the “hoopla booth” at the Lakeview Amusement Park in Tulsa and allegedly sustained a back injury arising out of her employment She thereafter filed her claim for compensation and an award was entered in her favor.
The order of the trial judge, sustained on appeal to the Court en banc, recited that claimant had received a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Bank of Tulsa Bldg. v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Barney U. Brown & Sons, Inc. v. SavageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Garr v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Burger v. LickliterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Fuller White Chevrolet Company v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Red Rock Mental Health v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Osmus v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977