Legal Opinion
Blankenship v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided August 8, 2022No. 3:19-cv-00146Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CORY BLANKENSHIP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:19-cv-00146 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT ) OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON ) COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ) ) Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Permanent Injunction (Doc. No. 97, “Motion”), supported by an accompanying memorandum (Doc. No. 98). Defendant filed a response (Doc. No. 100), and Plaintiff filed a reply (Doc. No. 101). For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND1…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dolgencorp, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ilona of Hungary, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Dolgencorp, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Valentine v. CollierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.