Legal Opinion

In Re Clark

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1910No. Civ. No. 744PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by the people of the state of California from a decree of distribution and the order denying a motion for a new trial. It is stated by appellant that these two questions are involved: "First, were the rulings of the trial court correct in the admission of statements claimed to have been made by certain deceased persons, not shown by any independent proof to have been related by blood or marriage to Eliza Clark? Secondly. Assuming all the testimony admissible, was the same sufficient to establish relationship between petitioner and Eliza Clark?"

The distributees claimed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of HartmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. New York Life Insurance v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Vantine v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Whittenberg v. MuellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API