Legal Opinion

Associated Press v. Montana Senate Republican Caucus

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1997No. 96-640PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

This is an appeal from the District Court’s November 16, 1995 order dismissing the Appellants’ complaint. The trial court held that the Respondent Senate and House Republican and Democratic party in-session caucuses were not persons within the meaning of Rule 4A, M.R.Civ.P, and that, therefore, the court did not have jurisdiction over them. Subsequently, on July 12, 1996, the court’s order was converted into one for summary judgment, and this appeal followed. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Issue

We address but one issue in this appeal: Under Montana law, are the Senate and House…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Common Cause v. Statutory Committee to Nominate Candidates for Commissioner of Political PracticesMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ash Grove Cement Co. v. Jefferson CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Elk Park Ranch, Inc. v. Park CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bird v. HillerMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Common Cause of Montana v. ArgenbrightMontana Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Giacomelli v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Miller v. Eighteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Rich v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State, Department of Revenue v. Alpine Aviation, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. MacPheat v. SchaufMontana Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API