Legal Opinion

Aguilar v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 4, 1998No. 3:97CV768 (WWE)Published

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Arnold Aguilar moves, pro se and absent objection, for reconsideration of the court’s March 16, 1998 Ruling on Plaintiffs Motion for Return of Property. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and Local Rule 9(e), the instant motion will be granted and the court’s March 16,1998 ruling will be vacated in part.

On March 16, 1998, the court found that the government had employed means reasonably calculated to notify plaintiff of an administrative forfeiture proceeding when, in addition to publishing a notice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yeung Mung Weng v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Ye Wen Hong v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API