Concord National Bank v. Haverhill
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
In this jurisdiction the allowance of attorneys’ fees has developed slowly and generally speaking has not been as liberal as in our neighboring states. Kimball v. Bible Society, 65 N. H. 139, 160; Guay v. Association, 87 N. H. 216, 221, 222; Richter, Probate Fees: The Story of a Remedial Statute, 32 B. U. L. Rev. 54, 60 (1952). Counsel fees were not allowed in Borchers v. Taylor, 83 N. H. 564, 572, but in that case it is to be noted that they were sought by parties contesting the validity of a charitable trust. Parties seeking to defeat a charitable trust are not entitled to an allowance out…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Living Trust Created by AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Wemme v. First Church of ChristOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Vanderbilt University v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Horse Pond Fish & Game Club, Inc. v. CormierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- In re DumaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- In re Estate LeonardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.