In re Dumaine
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
Elizabeth Ann Charney appeals the ruling of the Superior Court (Pappagianis, J.) that she is not a member of the class of “legitimate” beneficiaries of the Dumaines and Dumaines New Fund trusts. She raises five issues on appeal. First, she argues that the trial court erred in its construction of the term “legitimate” as “lawfully begotten, born in wedlock.” Second, she asserts that the trial court improperly relied on depositions containing inadmissible hearsay in determining the settlor’s intent. Third, she maintains that, even though she was adopted, the subsequent marriage of her natural…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Evans v. AbneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Geraldine C. Medina v. Warren B. RudmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Bartlett v. DumaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Richardson TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance v. CreteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Flaherty v. FlahertySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- In Re Estate of WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Patterson v. RosaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.