Rich v. Solari
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order overruling a motion to quash an attachment on judgment. The Case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bingham
The plaintiff declared, on a promissory note for $500, made and signed by the firm name of Solari Brothers; Camille Solari was served with process and filed a plea denying indebtedness, but. without affidavit, under the rule. Joseph Solari was not found, and the officers so returned.
January 15, 1887, judgment was rendered against both defendants, on motion of the plaintiff. February 9, 1887, this judgment was set aside on the plaintiff’s motion and a judgment rendered against Camille Solari.
On the same day an attachment was sued out on the *375judgment, and process served on the Metropolitan…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Inbusch v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Williams v. Amsinck & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Johnston v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870