Williams v. Amsinck & Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City, in Equity. This was an appeal from an order of the Court helow intructing the auditor that the appellees, Amsinck & Co., as assignees of Solomon, were entitled to priority in the distribution of the assets of Johnson & Behr among their creditors. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtAlyey, J.
This case has been in this Court on a former appeal, (34 Md., 646,) when the main question involved was the *350validity of the deed of assignment from Johnson & Behr, partners, to Eugene Cummiskey; and the deed having been vacated and set aside, the question on the present appeal arises in regard to the distribution of the fund, the proceeds of the effects of the partnership, among the creditors. Amsinck & Co., as assignees of Solomon, one of the original complainants in whose name the bill was filed to vacate the deed, not only claim to participate with the other creditors of the partnership in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crane v. FrenchNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Ellicott v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
- Ellicott v. United States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
- Green v. BealsNew York Supreme Court · 1804
- Foley v. BitterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Morton v. GrafflinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Blaker v. SandsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Western National Bank v. National Union BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Shafer Bros. v. KiteCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.