Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Frisby

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Walker. Tried below before the Hon. J. R. Burnett.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

I do not know how far a husband would be morally bound by a postnuptial contract in which he hires his wife to live with him ; but the legal obligation cannot be recognized in this court. Roberts sues Frisby on a note calling for $1500, which upon its face is a good note ; but the evidence shows that the note was intended to compromise a difficulty between Frisby and his wife r that he owed her nothing ; that Roberts is her brother, and that the note was for the use of the wife; that if anybody has a right to it, it is his wife, who, though living apart from him, is still his lawful wife. We…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. French v. GrenetTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Merrill v. PeasleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Estate of KeslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Campbell v. PraterWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Stone v. Heirs of CrawfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API