Legal Opinion
State v. Flood
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 21, 1995No. 94-1497PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The State charged Mark A. Flood with violating Wis. Adm. Code § ATCP 125.02(1), which prohibits the operator of a mobile home park from requiring the purchase of a mobile home as a condition to the rental of a site at the park. These are known in the industry as "tie-ins" or "tied sales." The threshold issue is whether a plot of land which is owned by the operator and is part of the mobile home park, but which is presently undeveloped, is nonetheless a "site" within the meaning of the regulation. We hold that such plot of land is a "site" and reverse the trial court order dis missing the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Graphic Products Distributors, Inc. v. Itek Corporation, Individually and D/B/A Itek Graphic Products, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Josam Manufacturing Co. v. State Board of HealthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Metropolitan Builders Ass'n v. Village of GermantownCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Elkhart Lake's Road America, Inc. v. Chicago Historic Races, Ltd., and Joseph MarchettiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Benkoski v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Ecker Bros. v. Calumet CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- State v. EdlebeckCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995