Legal Opinion

Wood v. Oakland & Berkeley Rapid Transit Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1895No. 15779PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

— This is an appeal by the defendant, the Oakland & Berkeley Rapid Transit Company, from the judgment rendered against it and an order denying it a new trial in three separate actions, consol*502idated and tried as one, brought for the foreclosure of certain mechanics’ liens, for materials furnished and labor performed in the construction of a power-house for .said defendant.

1. It is claimed that the court below erred in overruling the demurrers of appellant to the several complaints, which were alike in the particulars objected to. The first ground of objection is, that there was a misjoinder of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Giant Powder Co. v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Butterworth v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. McMenomy v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Joost v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. San Francisco Paving Co. v. FairfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API