Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentChief Justice Stone
I think the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals was right and should be affirmed.
Respondent, reinsurer of an automobile public liability insurance policy, has been made a party to a garnishment proceeding instituted under the Missouri statutes by petitioner, who has secured a Missouri default judgment upon a liability of the insured said to be covered by the policy. By this suit brought in the federal District Court for Kansas, respondent now seeks among other things to set aside the judgment, so far as it establishes liability against the insurer, as fraudulently obtained.
Respondent’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Consumers Finance Service, Inc. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Potter v. WhittenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Reid, Murdock & Co. v. MercurioMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Nevatt v. Springfield Normal SchoolMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899