Legal Opinion

Williams v. Barber

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1988No. 20893Published

1Opinion of the Court

765 P.2d 887 (1988)

Dalvin J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

James N. BARBER, Martin Verhoef, and David E. Yocom, partners in the law firm of Barber, Verhoef & Yocom, Defendants and Appellees.

No. 20893.

Supreme Court of Utah.

November 28, 1988.

Eric Taylor, Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff and appellant.

James N. Barber, Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellees.

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:

Appellant Dalvin J. Williams appeals from a judgment of the trial court awarding him damages for the legal malpractice of appellee James N. Barber, contending that the award is inadequate.

This legal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Mendoza v. SchlossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Bartholomew v. CrockettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Glidden v. TerranovaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API