Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Crockett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 6, 1985No. 83-2401PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE WHITE

delivered the opinion of the court:

Jane Bartholomew brought this action against defendant, Lavert Crockett, for personal injuries sustained as a result of a motor vehicle collision and against her former attorneys, Paul Caghan, David Wittenberg and Wittenberg & Caghan, Ltd. (attorneys), for malpractice in handling the aforementioned claim. Appellant’s two-count amended complaint was dismissed as to all defendants.

The amended complaint alleges that on June 2, 1980, Bartholomew was driving her automobile in the course of her employment as a nurse inspector for the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hering v. HiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Madden v. KuehnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Ellis v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and UniversitiesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People Ex Rel. Board of Trustees v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Currie v. LaoIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Healy v. VaupelIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Lucey v. Law Offices of Pretzel & Stouffer, CharteredAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Robb v. SuttonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API