Glascock v. . Gray
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN to recover possession of a tract of land, beard by Ward, Jat January Term, 1908, of WASHINGTON. A jury trial was waived and the facts Avere found by tbe court. From a judgment declaring that plaintiffs, in no vieAV of the case, were entitled to recover, they appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtEeoavN, J.
The plaintiffs claim title under a deed executed by the executors of P. N. Gray by virtue of a poAver contained in his will. In September, 1902, P. N. Gray died testate, domiciled in Ohio, seized in fee simple of the land in question in North Carolina, together with other real estate in Ohio. By his avíII A. H: Johnson and Philemon J. Dill, residents of Ohio, were named as his executors.’ The aaJII was probated in Franklin County, Ohio, and the executors Avere regularly qualified in.that State. In December, 1902, the will was duly admitted to probate in Washington and Tyrrell counties, North…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Doe, Lessee of Lewis & Wife v. Mfarland & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Godfrey v. HumphreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1836
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Vaught v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- First National Bank v. PancakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Michelsen v. PenneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Vaught v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.