Legal Opinion

Mikinberg v. Baltic Steamship Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 10, 1993No. 343, Docket 92-7681PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Motel Mikinberg appeals pro se from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Glasser, J.) granting summary judgment to defendants-appellees Baltic Steamship Company, Rice Unruh, and Reynolds Company (collectively “Baltic” or “the Baltic defendants”) and defendant-appellee Universal Maritime Services (“Universal”). The district court dismissed Mikinberg’s complaint based on its finding that Mikinberg failed to file a timely claim under the one-year statute of limitations of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Thomas E. Hoar, Inc. v. Sara Lee Corp., Appeal of Greenspan, Jaffe & Rosenblatt, Leon J. Greenspan, Paul D. Jaffe and Victor E. RosenblattCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hudson Hotels Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, and Robert HazardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. New York Marine & General Insurance v. S/S "Ming Prosperity"District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  3. In Re M/V Dg HarmonyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Street, Sound Around Electronics, Inc. v. M/V Royal ContainerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  5. Artis v. LiotardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API