Legal Opinion
Artis v. Liotard
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 26, 1996No. 94 CV 3342PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER
PARKER, District Judge.
FACTS
This pro se action for the violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff, Robert James Artis, claims that defendant police officers, Edward Liotard and John Calvello, arrested him on December 23, 1992 without probable cause. He accordingly charges defendants Liotard, Calvello, and the South Fallsberg Police Department with violations of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jorge Gomez and Henry SernaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Garcia v. GasparriDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Martinetti v. Town of New Hartford Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Martinetti v. Town of New Hartford Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Cogswell v. County of Suffolk Deputy Sheriff's Dept.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Bontatibus v. AyrDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.