Legal Opinion
Pereira v. Astrue
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 25, 2010No. Civil Action No. 09-1024PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
HURLEY, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiff, Jose Pereira, (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) which denied his claim for disability benefits. Presently before the Court are Defendant’s motion for remand for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and Plaintiffs cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings. Both parties seek remand, but Plaintiff seeks a remand solely for the calculation of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cabibi v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Wider v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Ingrassia v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Box v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Dimartino v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.