Legal Opinion

United States v. Grajeda

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 16, 2007No. 06-4120PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[PUBLISHED]

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

Following the district court’s 1 denial of her motion to suppress the fruits of a vehicle search, Amalia Grajeda entered a conditional plea of guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine or its isomers, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1). The conditional plea preserved her right to appeal the denial of her motion to suppress, and she now argues that suppression was warranted because the search was tainted by a Fourth Amendment violation, which was not cured by her consent. We affirm.

Ms. Grajeda was a passenger in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. New York v. ClassSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Kevin P. DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. CaroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. EsquivelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. BenitezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. BarnumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Robert MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. RamosDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API