Legal Opinion

West v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 2008No. ED 89573PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NANNETTE A. BAKER, Judge.

Introduction

Christopher Q. West (“Movant”) appeals from a judgment in the St. Louis County Circuit Court denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. In his four points on appeal, Movant claims that the motion court erred in denying his post-conviction motion because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to various statements and comments made by the prosecutor. We find no error and affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

In the light most favorable to the verdict, the facts adduced at trial reveal that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. KiserTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hays v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. TrambleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Demario R. Bello v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Deck v. SteeleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API