Legal Opinion

Daugherty v. Popick

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 2, 1981No. 80 Civ. 6051 (GLG)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

The plaintiffs move, pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to set aside this Court’s order of January 27, 1981 and to reargue the motions. The defendants had moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) and Rule 4(d)(3), to dismiss the summons and complaint on grounds of insufficiency of service of process. They also moved to dismiss or stay on grounds that there is an earlier action pending between the same parties for the same relief in the New York State courts. No opposition having been offered to the motions, they were granted,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Will v. Calvert Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lawrence W. Lambert v. David R. Conrad and Martha CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. Universal Gypsum of Georgia, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  4. Nigro v. BlumbergDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Pyles v. KeaneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ABCKO Music, Inc. v. Beverly Glen Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  2. Burton v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. CBS, Inc. v. Tee Vee Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Guinness Mahon Cayman Trust, Ltd. v. Windels, Marx, Davies & IvesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  5. Syl Consulting LLC v. Community USA II LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API