Legal Opinion

United States v. Xavier Serna

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 23, 2006No. 04-10597PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.

We consider whether possession of an assault weapon in violation of California Penal Code section 12280(b) is a “crime of violence” under the federal Sentencing Guidelines.

Facts

Serna pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). It wasn’t the first time Serna had illegally possessed a firearm- — -he had previously pleaded guilty to violating California Penal Code § 12280(b), which outlaws possession of “assault weapons.” 1 The district court concluded that Serna’s state-court conviction was a “crime of violence.” See U.S.S.G. §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. Richard Samuel HuffhinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. The United States of America v. Joe Alvin AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Marco Eugene ForemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. MarceauCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Hector Reina-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. CramptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API