Legal Opinion
McDonnell v. State of Ill.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 2, 2000PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment and disposition of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Braithwaite’s thoughtful and comprehensive opinion. McDonnell v. State of Illinois, 319 N.J.Super. 324, 725 A.2d 126 (App.Div.1999). We add these further observations, however, in view of the strongly asserted views expressed by the Solicitor General of Illinois, appearing pro hoc vice before our Court, that plaintiffs cause of action against the State of Illinois, the Illinois Department of Revenue (IDOR), and individual IDOR employees should be dismissed on comity grounds.
As…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ehrlich-Bober & Co. v. University of HoustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Morrison v. Budget Rent A Car Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Schoeberlein v. Purdue UniversityIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Burns v. BelafskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Blakey v. Continental Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Bowers v. . National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n, Act, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Ross Fogg Fuel Oil Co. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2005
- Brown v. City of BordentownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.