Legal Opinion

Temple Management Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacCrate, J.

Judgment for defendant dismissing the complaint, with costs. The Court of Appeals in Metropolitan Savings Bank v. Tuttle (290 N. Y. 497) has stated that section 1077-cc of the Civil Practice Act was hastily framed and that transposition of language is necessary to arrive at the legislative intent. In the cited case it is stated that by section 1077-cc of the Civil Practice Act it was intended that the status quo as of the date of maturity of a mortgage should continue during the emergency period. In that case the mortgage had expired before the emergency period began, and the rate of interest…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Savings Bank v. TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Brighton Operating Corp. v. MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Elltan Realty Co. v. Irving Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovett v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Lovett v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Temple Management Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API