Legal Opinion

Agustin v. Dan Ostrow Const. Co., Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1981No. 7041PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, J.

In this appeal, the issue is whether plaintiffs-appellants’ suit is barred by the statute of limitations under § 657-8,1 Hawaii Revised Statutes. The circuit court dismissed plaintiffs-appellants’ com*81plaint, ruling that § 657-8 barred their claims. We disagree and reverse for reasons set forth herein.

Plaintiffs-appellants are homeowners (Homeowners). In 1977, they filed a complaint in the circuit court against Dan Ostrow Construction Co., Inc. (Contractor) and other unidentified defendants for damages based on both contract and tort claims. Their complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Fujioka Ex Rel. Fujioka v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Waugh v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. SylvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. ReisHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Architechtonics Construction Management, Inc. v. KhorramCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Peer News LLC v. City and County of Honolulu.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API