Agustin v. Dan Ostrow Const. Co., Inc.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, J.
In this appeal, the issue is whether plaintiffs-appellants’ suit is barred by the statute of limitations under § 657-8,1 Hawaii Revised Statutes. The circuit court dismissed plaintiffs-appellants’ com*81plaint, ruling that § 657-8 barred their claims. We disagree and reverse for reasons set forth herein.
Plaintiffs-appellants are homeowners (Homeowners). In 1977, they filed a complaint in the circuit court against Dan Ostrow Construction Co., Inc. (Contractor) and other unidentified defendants for damages based on both contract and tort claims. Their complaint…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Fujioka Ex Rel. Fujioka v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- Waugh v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SylvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ReisHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Architechtonics Construction Management, Inc. v. KhorramCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Peer News LLC v. City and County of Honolulu.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.