Legal Opinion

Central National Bank of Cleveland v. King

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1978No. 76-1682PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

Our disposition of this appeal is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), which provides that findings of fact of a trial court shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and that in determining whether a trial court’s findings are, or are not, clearly, erroneous an appellate court must give due regard to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses. In our view, the trial court’s findings of fact in the instant case are not clearly erroneous, and it is on that basis that we affirm.

Although the overriding issue in this case is a simple…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Morrison v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  3. Wiley v. ByrdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Central National Bank of Cleveland, Ohio v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API