Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Hayden

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1946No. Appeal, 43PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The controlling question is whether the property and business conducted by the Hayden Tire Shop belonged to John Hayden or to a partnership composed of him and his brother George, the defendant.

John Playden died October 18, 1943. His widow received letters of administration. She claimed the Hayden Tire Shop as part of her husband’s estate which had become subject to her administration. The property was in possession of the intestate’s brother, George Hayden, who excluded the administratrix on the ground that it belonged to the partnership composed of the intestate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Bowman v. Gum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Fleming v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Froess v. FroessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Myers v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sigal v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Meth v. MethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Simpson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Lower Merion Township v. FrankelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Slater v. SlaterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API