Application of John B. Dwyer, Joseph W. Jewell, William B. Johnson, Henry G. McGrath and Louis C. Rubin
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 8 in appellants’ application 1 entitled “Reforming of Gaseous Hydrocarbons” as unpatentable over the prior art.
The application discloses a process for converting normally gaseous hydrocarbons such as methane or natural gas with steam and/or carbon dioxide to produce hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Appellants concede that process, referred to as hydrocarbon reforming, to be old. They say, however, that it has been the desire of the art to achieve reforming at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Application of ReidCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
3Cited by5 opinions
- Application of Arthur v. HughesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Arthur v. HughesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Jerry E. CotnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983