Legal Opinion

Application of John B. Dwyer, Joseph W. Jewell, William B. Johnson, Henry G. McGrath and Louis C. Rubin

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 16, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 8 in appellants’ application 1 entitled “Reforming of Gaseous Hydrocarbons” as unpatentable over the prior art.

The application discloses a process for converting normally gaseous hydrocarbons such as methane or natural gas with steam and/or carbon dioxide to produce hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Appellants concede that process, referred to as hydrocarbon reforming, to be old. They say, however, that it has been the desire of the art to achieve reforming at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of ReidCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of Arthur v. HughesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. Application of Arthur v. HughesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. Application of Jerry E. CotnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API