Legal Opinion

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 14, 1983No. 83-613, 83-614Published

1Opinion of the Court

721 F.2d 1540

220 U.S.P.Q. 303

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

GARLOCK, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 83-613, 83-614.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

Nov. 14, 1983.

David H. Pfeffer, New York City, argued for appellant/cross-appellee; J. Robert Dailey and Janet Dore, New York City, John S. Campbell, Newark, Del., of counsel.

John J. Mackiewicz, Philadelphia, Pa., argued for appellee/cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Dale M. Heist, Philadelphia, Pa., Bernard Ouziel, New York City, of counsel.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and MILLER,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API