Legal Opinion

Pamlico-Tar River Foundation v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided August 6, 2004No. 4:02-cv-00053PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MALCOLM J. HOWARD, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, defendant PCS Phosphate Company, Inc’s. (“PCS”) motion for summary judgment, and federal defendants 1 , motion for sum mary judgment. Responses and replies have been filed. Also before the court is plaintiffs motion to amend the scheduling order and to supplement the record. Defendant PCS responded to plaintiffs motion, and plaintiff replied, although federal defendants did not respond. In addition, this court held a hearing in this matter on July 20, 2004. Therefore, this matter…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
  2. D'Olive Bay Restoration & Preservation Committee, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
  3. Center for Biological Diversity v. HaalandDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2024
  4. North Carolina Wildlife Federation v. North Carolina Department of TransportationDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API