Legal Opinion
In re Rosoff
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the Bar at the Second Judicial Department in 1977, and at relevant times since then he has been employed within the First Department. In November 1996 this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for failure to meet his child-support obligations (225 AD2d 197). We have not yet been apprised by the Suffolk County Family Court that such arrears have been satisfied.
In December 1997, in a six-count indictment in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, respondent was charged with conspiracy to commit securities…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re MargiottaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re GlaubermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re RosoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
4Cited by6 opinions
- In re NovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re GansmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re DrescherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re BalisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.