Legal Opinion

In re Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 26, 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys of the State of New York pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) upon the ground that respondent has been disbarred based on a conviction of a felony as defined by Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e).

Respondent Israel Grossman was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, on May 2, 1979 under the name of Israel Gedaliah Grossman. Respondent maintained a…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re ReichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re DavidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. In re GansmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In re CutilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. In re RosoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. In re WoodwardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API