Legal Opinion
United States v. Zamora
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 31, 1999No. CV 98-336 TUC-JMR. Bankruptcy No. 97-4679 SV-JMM. Adversary No. 98-023PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROLL, District Judge.
Appellant United States appeals from a decisions stated by the United States Bankruptcy Court. For the reasons stated below, the Court vacates the bankrupt cy court’s order and remands for further proceedings.
Facts
On January 21, 1994, Debtor Amada Zamora agreed to act as a surety on a bail bond issued to secure the appearance of a defendant in a federal criminal case being prosecuted in the Southern District of California. 1 Debtor agreed to pay $25,000 in the event that the defendant did not appear in court. Debtor paid no cash and the obligation was unsecured.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In Re: Daniels-Head & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pioneer General Insurance Co. v. Midkiff (In Re Midkiff)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1988
- County of Berks v. Damore (In Re Damore)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hickman v. Texas (In Re Hickman)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. v. Sandoval (In Re Sandoval)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Gi NamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. v. SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- City of Philadelphia v. Nam (In Re Nam)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999