Legal Opinion

State v. Orr

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2005No. 20041057PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 The question before us is whether the district court erred in extending David J. Orr’s probation when (1) Orr did not receive notice that the State intended to seek an extension of probation until seven days after his probation was originally set to expire and (2) the district court, in its written order, did not expressly find that Orr had violated a term of his probation or that such violation was willful. We conclude that notice of a probation extension proceeding is sufficient, even if served after the original probationary term was set to expire, provided…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ronald Skipworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. Smith v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. VirginUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Utley v. Mill Man Steel, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. CarrenoUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. State v. TerrazasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API