Legal Opinion

Riceland Foods, Inc. v. Bayer CropScience US

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 31, 2016No. 15-2690, 15-2693, 15-2850, 15-2893, 15-3245Published

1Opinion of the Court

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.

Bayer AG, along with several of its corporate subsidiaries, and Riceland, Inc., appeal an order of the district court 2 requiring Bayer to cause the deposit of a portion of a settlement between Bayer and Rice-land into a common-benefit trust fund. This fund was established to compensate attorneys leading the multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) concerning Bayer’s Liber-tyLink LL601 genetically modified rice. We addressed challenges to the creation of the fund in In re Genetically Modified Rice Litigation (Rice I), 764 F.3d 864, 870-71, 873-74 (8th Cir.2014).

Bayer and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API