Legal Opinion

People v. Holnagel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1963No. Calendar 58, Docket 49,948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Defendant was awaiting trial in circuit court on a charge of kidnapping. He filed. *349a petition praying for psychiatric examination and that he be declared a criminal sexual psychopathic person under PA 1939, No 165, as amended (CL 1948 .and CLS 1956, § 780.501 et seq. [Stat Ann 1954 Rev §28.967(1) et seq.]), hereinafter called the act. It was dismissed for insufficiency, but defendant was permitted to file an amended petition. The court then appointed 3 psychiatrists to examine defendant and report to the court. A hearing was had at which 1 of the 3 psychiatrists testified. The court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re FidrychMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. ArtinianMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. In Re CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. In Re KelmarMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In Re PryorMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frederick Holnagel v. George A. Kropp, Warden, State Prison of Southern MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  2. People v. GriffesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. People v. ShieldsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Silvers v. PeopleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. HolnagelMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API