Legal Opinion

In Re: Petrobras SEC. Litig.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 1, 2020No. 19-3531Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-3531 In Re: Petrobras Sec. Litig. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Marion S. Mishkin Law Office v. LopaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. In Re Bolar Pharmaceutical Company, Incorporated, Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Kickham Hanley P.C. v. Kodak Retirement Income PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API