Legal Opinion

People v. Myers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s Alford plea (see, North Carolina v Alford, 400 US 25) was entered knowingly, voluntarily and with an understanding of its consequences (supra; see also, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, 353; People v Serrano, 15 NY2d 304). Moreover, where, as here, defendant entered a bargained plea to a lesser crime it was unnecessary for him to recite a factual basis for the particular crime confessed (see, People v Hall, 71 NY2d 1002, 1006; People v Clairborne, 29 NY2d 950, 951). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. People v. SerranoNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. People v. ClairborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ZelkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. ParishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API