Legal Opinion

People v. Spencer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that his factual statement of the crime of assault in the second degree was insufficient. Although defendant’s initial statement suggested the absence of one of the essential elements of the crime charged (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]), the court’s further inquiry regarding the facts elicited a sufficient statement of all elements of that crime. Defendant, by failing to express dissatisfaction with the court’s , inquiry and by failing to move to withdraw his plea, waived further challenge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. MyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API