Legal Opinion
Harris v. Barone
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 15, 1960PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover for legal services rendered to him as administrator of his decedent’s estate. General Statutes § 52-202. The defendant filed a motion to dissolve a garnishment by the plaintiff of funds allegedly due the estate in compromise of a suit to recover for the wrongful death of the decedent. The ■defendant claimed that the garnishment was illegal and void. The court granted the motion, and the plaintiff has appealed. The sole question for de termination is whether the court had any authority to enter the order dissolving the garnishment.
The right to attach…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reilly v. Antonio Pepe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Clime v. GregorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Potter v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- State v. CambriaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Uva v. AlonzySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Pavlinko v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Lynch v. Household Finance CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.