Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 13, 1915No. 6812Published

Error from District Court, Washita County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by the State against Ollie Murphy and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants E. L. Holland and another bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.

This is an action on an appearance hond¡ given by the defendant Murphy as principal and the other defendants as sureties. Summons was issued out- of the district court of Washita county, and sent to the1 sheriff of Bryan county to be there served upon defendants Lee and Holland, which summons was afterwards returned to the clerk of the district court of Washita-county, with the sheriff’s return thereon, showing due and legal service, but not the date thereof. The clerk of the district court, noticing the defect in the return^ brought it to the attention of the county attorney, whol after…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Payne v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. First Nat. Bank of Mill Creek v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. HugheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  4. Foster v. CrawfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  5. Furr v. Bank of FairmountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API