Payne v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Cowt of Garfield Countyj before John L. McAtee, Distribt Judge. STATEMENT OP THE CASE. This was an action brought by the Long-Bell Lumber company on the 10th day of April, 1896, in the district court of Garfield county, against the plaintiffs in error, to recover the sum of $424.44, upon a certain promissory note, and the foreclosure of a certain mortgage executed by the defendants on the 6th day of December, 1894, on the following described real…
Read the full summary
Error from the District Cowt of Garfield Countyj before John L. McAtee, Distribt Judge. STATEMENT OP THE CASE. This was an action brought by the Long-Bell Lumber company on the 10th day of April, 1896, in the district court of Garfield county, against the plaintiffs in error, to recover the sum of $424.44, upon a certain promissory note, and the foreclosure of a certain mortgage executed by the defendants on the 6th day of December, 1894, on the following described real estate, to-wit: Lot 8, in block 14, in the city of Enid. • On the first day A March, 1897, the Long-Bell Lumber company…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
■ TIainer, J.:
The various questions presented by the parties' to this proceeding may be considered in three propositions:
1. Did the Methodist Episcopal Church acquire such an interest in the property after the order of sale was issued, and before the confirmation, as to entitle it to make a motion to confirm the sale?
2. Did the court err in allowing' and disallowing certain amendments to he made on the return of the sheriff?
3. Did the plaintiff in the court below have the righE to have the proceedings dismissed after the sale of the property, and before the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dewey v. LinscottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Commissioners Douglas County v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Galbreath v. DroughtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Cowdin v. CowdinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- New England Mortgage Security Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State Ex Rel. Wildlife Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Central Credit UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- In Re KlappUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1987
- Harris v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Watkins v. FrenchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.